Politicians are adept at three things: finding a camera for their vanity speeches, taxing our money for redistribution, and lying about being media whores and reallocating our dollars to aid in their re-election.
That should be a good beginning to our deep dive into the world of “climate change.”
Climate change has been on the radar for over 50-years. Without reaching back into the hysteria of our planet freezing – no, melting – uh, rather drowning – we have been sold a bill of goods throughout those five decades.
My elementary school days were filled with math, geography, history, and science. During those science lessons, we were taught that carbon was a natural substance which, according to Britannica.com, “On a weight basis, carbon is 19th in order of elemental abundance in Earth’s crust, and there are estimated to be 3.5 times as many carbon atoms as silicon atoms in the universe. Only hydrogen, helium, oxygen, neon, and nitrogen are atomically more abundant in the cosmos than carbon. Carbon is the cosmic product of the “burning” of helium, in which three helium nuclei, 4, fuse to produce a carbon nucleus, atomic weight 12.”
If
your eyes just glazed over, or in the event you felt as though you
now need a stiff drink, what Britannica said is that carbon is
abundant in nature. Carbon is the base of diamonds and oyster shells
as well as petroleum and animal tissue. In other words, it’s
everywhere.
Now politicians and environmentalists alike are not necessarily known for their brilliance. If they were brilliant, they would know that carbon is also in something called “carbon dioxide,” or CO₂, a by-product of exhaling living beings.
Simply put, when we inhale air, our bodies process that air through our lungs which produce CO₂. Way back when, CO₂ was thought to be a good thing because too much in the human body will cause us to suffocate. Hence, it’s good news that we rid this chemical compound from our bodies.
But, according to NOAA’s Climate.gov site, “Each year, human activities release more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than natural processes can remove, causing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to increase.” That’s the bad news.
Short of holding our collective breaths, it appears as though our future looks dim. Climate.gov continues, “Carbon dioxide concentrations are rising mostly because of the fossil fuels that people are burning for energy. Fossil fuels like coal and oil contain carbon that plants pulled out of the atmosphere through photosynthesis over many millions of years; we are returning that carbon to the atmosphere in just a few hundred.” The fact our breathing is not only to blame for Earth’s demise is good news.
Further, Climate.gov states, “Carbon dioxide is Earth’s most important greenhouse gas: a gas that absorbs and radiates heat. Unlike oxygen or nitrogen (which make up most of our atmosphere), greenhouse gases absorb heat radiating from the Earth’s surface and re-release it in all directions—including back toward Earth’s surface. Without carbon dioxide, Earth’s natural greenhouse effect would be too weak to keep the average global surface temperature above freezing.” Alas, more bad news.
Not to worry, the good news is that plant life on Earth – to include grass, trees, flowers, pretty much any green plant – produces oxygen by using those nasty carbon molecules in reforming CO₂. Yea! Good news.
Unfortunately, The Guardian, a British “news” source provided the world with a recent story regarding the environment. Headlined, “Trees and land absorbed almost no CO₂ last year. Is nature’s carbons sink failing?” Yep, more bad news.
Evidently, per The Guardian, Greenland’s glaciers and Arctic Ice sheets are melting faster than expected exposing zooplankton to more “sunlight – a shift scientists say could keep them in the [ocean] depths for longer, disrupting the vertical migration that stores carbon on the ocean floor.”
But here’s more good news. That heat created by trapped greenhouse gasses is not warming the planet inasmuch as sunlight is able to reach the ocean depths. And those weaselly politicians who feel more money – in the form of “carbon credits” – will solve virtually any problem, may now remove their grubby hands from my wallet pocket. This is both good news and bad, depending on whose side you are on.
A fellow who served as vice president, Al Gore, found his true meaning in life as a superhero for the environmental movement after his many years as a U.S. Senator, and subsequent vice president under Bill Clinton. Gore was so dedicated to saving our planet that he used a private jet to fly around our fragile orb while demanding Earthlings stop using private jets.
Gore
also made movies and documentaries about our crisis for survival
while penning uplifting books about how we are all going to die
because of our poor stewardship of our home planet. He even
suggested the brilliant plan incorporating carbon credits into our
economy to force weak humans into complying with his stellar plan to
eliminate electricity in favor of candlelight.
Al "Carbon Credit" Gore
By paying more people will use less. Well, the lower and middle classes will, anyway.
But getting back on track, you see, you can’t have it both ways. Either there is a problem with carbon, or there isn’t. Contriving a financial punishment both on businesses and consumers, by way of carbon credits is just another way to pander to environmentalists and scientists who are paid to examine these “crises.”
Forcing what is merely a tax by any other name on consumers, plus the affected businesses who pass these extra costs onto the users, is nothing more than a grift created and operated by the guvment.
Buying carbon credits to save the planet is insane because carbon is everywhere. Man has proven he is incapable of controlling, or even influencing, our weather or climate. Still, the drumbeat continues because of fear of the “destruction of our planet.”
It’s time to grow up and think reasonably about the ‘cry wolf’ tactics being employed to control the people and their money.