Since the advent of the internet, information has become readily available to virtually anyone, anytime, anywhere. As an added bonus, communications betwixt and between common folk have been expedited to nearly instantaneous speed.
There’s no more waiting for ‘snail mail’ to arrive, we no longer have to send a facsimile containing important data, nor do we see delays in transferring pictures and videos; it is all now virtually instant, worldwide.
It has been a few short weeks now since a fellow named Charlie Kirk was gunned down by a mentally ill loser. This assassination occurred on September 10th, 2025, in Utah, at the Utah Valley University.
By way of background, Charlie was a political conservative who used debates that were open to all, usually on college campuses, to provide answers to niggling personal issues and questions.
This is where it must be pointed out that I have never met nor spoken to Charlie, as we live in very different macrocosms – Charlie’s was an impressive one spanning across the globe, while mine consists of small potatoes. Very small.
That being said, this is where the proverbial wheat and chaff are separated. It has become crystal clear the divide in the political aisle is becoming farther and farther in the world of politics, since Charlie’s assassination.
By the way, an assassination specifically refers to the murder of a prominent person, often for political reasons, while murder is a broader term that encompasses the unlawful killing of a person without justification.
Charlie visited many venues, as well as countless institutions of higher “learning” over the past 13-years since he started Turning Point USA (TPUSA) as a means to reach out to students in Marxist-leaning colleges and universities.
There, he entertained questions as well as comments from students in a forum of which Plato would be proud. Imagine exercising civility where dissent is frowned upon. Students who have been force-fed tripe about Charlie, capitalism, religion, white people, COVID-19, race relations, the great climate hoax, and America itself, were all subjects fielded at these free spirited debates.
But without Charlie now able to express his phenomenal gifts of free thought and expression, we are today seeing a different type of creature emerge from the bowels of Earth. This subhuman group cannot be defined using the word “people.” That would be much too kind of a moniker for the unfit-for-polite-company of which I am referring.
Take
the likes of Congressclowns Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar,
Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jasmine Crockett, in addition to
former presidential candidate Kamala Harris, and her running mate
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Although not limited to these losers,
each one of these embarrassments have called Republican politicians
and their supporters fascists and NAZIs and worse.
A Charlie Kirk wannabe
Those slurs have been highly offensive beginning in the 1940’s World War II against the Germans and Italians, in Europe since it was associated with the slaughter of an estimated six-million Jews.
To label half our current nation with such vile derogations is unconscionable. Unfortunately, this action is intentional to incite anger, hate, along with savage violence. And the weak minded among us – those aforementioned subhumans – are ready and eager to exact punishment on everyone for electing and supporting our leader, President Donald Trump.
President Trump and Charlie were friends who appeared to work hand-in-glove with one another. Restoring a sense of pride in America’s youth was a large portion of Charlie’s mission, and he was successful.
Still, those subhumans who had nothing kind or civil to say about Charlie when he was alive are now doubling-down. Which is exactly where the internet, in general, is showing how such an important tool can be co-opted.
Social media has mutated into a cancer that has been destroying our nation along with personal relationships due to its extreme reach, expeditious speed, and anonymity for the mentally deficient.
Arrogant internet users quickly, boldly began posting despicable messages mentioning Charlie in ways that are morally reprehensible. Alas, it is not only the messages that evoke pause, but who is posting them are also disturbing.
Somalian refugee Ilhan Omar said, “What I do know for sure is that Charlie Kirk was someone who once said, ‘Guns save lives’ after a school shooting," Omar said. "Charlie was someone who was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police … downplay slavery and what Black people have gone through in this country by saying Juneteenth should never exist," according to Fox News.
“People are full of s---, and it’s important for us to call them out, while we feel anger and sadness and have, you know, empathy, which Charlie said it shouldn’t exist because that’s a newly created word or something," Omar said.
"Like, I have empathy for his kids and his wife and what they’re going through because I do not want that. No one should go through that, and we should hold ourselves, I hope, to a higher standard,” according to Fox News. An excellent example of retards using words but not knowing the meaning.
Seemingly countless teachers – elementary, high school, and college level – have also been exercising their First Amended rights to freedom of speech. Using canards to intentionally evoke ire, many of these educators are hopefully finding something new thanks to their actions: the unemployment line.
Apparently searching for relevance, a Toronto, Canada, public school teacher was “suspended after allegedly showing a video of Charlie Kirk’s assassination to students as young as 10 in his class,” according to the New York Post.
“The teacher also suggested that Kirk deserved to be killed, and gave the young students a speech about fascism and transgender issues, according to a report,” The New York Post continued.
Not being as isolated from the world as one would believe, an Eastern Shore institution, Arcadia Middle School, exposed a teacher named Jessica Merando. She felt compelled to share her uncivil feelings about Charlie’s assassination on Facebook. “[The] Civics teacher Jessica Merando wrote: ‘Good,’” according to a shoredailynews.com story.
To continue polishing her turd, Merando added: “For those who need me to clarify: Yes, I’m referring to him. Yes, I am celebrating. Yes, I hope he rots,” the shoredailynews.com story continued. It ended with Merando saying, “No, I won’t apologize.”
When contacted, the Accomack County Public Schools System had no comment. Of course.
Most of this dissent is a product of narcissists being media whores, people seeking notoriety if only for a few seconds. Not surprisingly, since Charlie was unabashedly Conservative with beliefs that included being pro-life, spiritual, decent, religious, intelligent, pro-Second Amendment, anti-illegal immigration, and transgender issues regarding children, where strong lines were socially drawn thereby creating either division or unity.
Unfortunately, many of his forum attendees arrived with a chip on their shoulders, prepared to spar. Yet, Charlie possessed a gift for disarming even the most virulent Leftist with a concoction of common sense as well as facts – things that are often overlooked and manufactured on the internet.
There’s an internet adage that goes, “Debating an idiot is like trying to play chess with a pigeon – it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.”
Charlie persevered with his semi-calm demeanor and superior intellect that was readily available to offer facts to solving simple conundrums. And for those reasons he was despised.
Charlie Kirk has risen to the top rung of the ‘socially acceptable’ ladder because of a coward who was incapable of debating Charlie. For that, a martyr was created – a victim who merely offered common sense to those who were indoctrinated for years with scholastic propaganda.
Thank you, Charlie. You will not be forgotten.
